This browser does not support the Video element.
Supreme Court rules Texas abortion clinics can sue over law
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that Texas abortion clinics can sue over the ban but won't stop the law from being enforced.
The Texas Supreme Court dealt a final blow to abortion providers’ federal challenge to the state’s latest abortion restrictions Friday.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: State judge declares Texas abortion law unconstitutional, doesn't stop enforcement
The court ruled that state medical licensing officials do not have authority to enforce the law, which bans abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy. This was the last, narrowly cracked window that abortion providers had left to challenge the law after the U.S. Supreme Court decimated their case in a December ruling.
The law has a unique private-enforcement mechanism that empowers private citizens to sue anyone who, in the law’s language, "aids or abets" an abortion after fetal cardiac activity is detected, usually around six weeks of pregnancy.
RELATED: Texas governor signs law banning abortions as early as 6 weeks
The law is designed to evade judicial review, a goal at which it has been largely successful so far. Abortion providers have tried to argue that the law is actually enforced by state officials — the clerks who docket the lawsuits, the attorney general and medical licensing officials who could discipline doctors, nurses or pharmacists who violate the law — which would give them someone to bring a constitutional challenge against in court.
This browser does not support the Video element.
The Breakdown: SCOTUS hears abortion argument
Thousands of right-to-life advocates and pro-choice supporters gathered outside the Supreme Court Wednesday, as nine justices inside heard from attorneys fighting to reinstate a Mississippi law that would ban abortions at 15 weeks.
The U.S. Supreme Court disagreed with all of those arguments but one, allowing a challenge against the medical licensing officials to proceed. That case then went back to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which sent it to the Texas Supreme Court to weigh in on.
This browser does not support the Video element.
SCOTUS hears Texas abortion arguments
It's been two months since the strictest abortion law in the country was allowed to take effect in Texas and already it's faced non-stop legal challenges.
In a hearing last month, Texas Solicitor General Judd Stone argued that there was no "ordinary English interpretation that entertains any possibility of public enforcement."
On Friday, the justices issued a ruling that seemed to agree with Stone’s "ordinary English interpretation" of the law.
"The Court concluded that Texas law does not authorize the state-agency executives to enforce the Act’s requirements, either directly or indirectly," they wrote.
RELATED: Texas's 'heartbeat bill', nation's toughest abortion law, reinstated
The case will now return to the 5th Circuit, which will likely use the Texas Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law to bring an end to this federal challenge.
This browser does not support the Video element.
New SCOTUS ruling- abortion providers can sue but the ban stays in place
On Friday Supreme Court Justices voted 8 to one that providers can sue government officials over the state's near total ban on abortion. However the strictest abortion law in the nation does still remain, blocking the procedure once a fetal heartbeat is detected, usually around six weeks when many women don't know they're pregnant.
There are other ongoing challenges to the law, including multidistrict litigation in which a state district judge found the law to be unconstitutional. That case is under appeal.
This article originally appeared in the Texas Tribune.
The Texas Tribune is a nonpartisan, nonprofit media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them – about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.